Spokesman Le Hai Binh at a regular press conference in Hanoi
by Vu Quoc Ngu, April 22, 2016
The annual report on human rights of Vietnam in 2015 of the U.S. Department of State refers to inaccurate information and presented a biased assessment on implementation of the Southeast Asian nation in human rights, said Spokesman Le Hai Binh of Vietnam’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Speaking at a regular press conference in Hanoi on April 21, Mr. Binh said the report released by the U.S. Department of State on April 13 recognized some results of Vietnam in ensuring human rights.
Vietnam always stands ready to engage in candid and open discussions with all countries including the US on the outstanding issues where we still have differences of opinion, Binh said.
Vietnam is ready to frankly discuss with other countries, including the U.S. on differences to enhance understanding and promote comprehensive cooperation, he noted.
According to the report of the U.S. Department of State, Vietnam is an authoritarian state monopolistically ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV). The most recent National Assembly elections, held in 2011, were neither free nor fair, despite limited competition among CPV-vetted candidates. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces.
The Vietnamese government began implementing laws in accordance with constitutional amendments, including human rights-related articles, promulgated in January 2014. In November the National Assembly passed several laws affecting the rights of its citizens, including a new penal code, criminal procedure code, law on custody and temporary detention, civil code, and civil procedure code. The criminal procedure code and the custody law codified the presumption of innocence, placed the burden of proof in criminal proceedings on the state, recognized a limited right to remain silent in certain circumstances, and loosened regulations on the right to counsel. The penal code retained vague national security provisions and in some areas added new offenses criminalizing preparatory acts, the report said.
The most serious human rights problems in the country were severe government restrictions of citizens’ political rights, particularly their right to change their government through free and fair elections; limits on citizens’ civil liberties, including freedom of assembly, association, and expression; and inadequate protection of citizens’ due process rights, including protection against arbitrary detention, it said.
Other human rights abuses included arbitrary and unlawful deprivation of life; police attacks and corporal punishment; arbitrary arrest and detention for political activities; continued police mistreatment of suspects during arrest and detention, including the use of lethal force and austere prison conditions; and denial of the right to a fair and expeditious trial. The judicial system was opaque and lacked independence, and political and economic influences regularly affected judicial outcomes. The government limited freedom of speech and suppressed dissent; exercised control over and censorship of the press; restricted internet freedom and freedom of religion; maintained often-heavy surveillance of activists; and continued to limit privacy rights and freedoms of assembly, association, and movement. The government continued to control registration of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) closely, including human rights organizations. Authorities restricted visits by human rights NGOs that did not agree to government oversight. Authorities and NGOs recorded higher numbers of human trafficking victims, possibly attributable to growing demand among neighboring countries as well as the country’s decision in 2012 to improve its efforts to track and investigate cases. The government maintained limits on workers’ rights to form and join independent unions and did not enforce safe and healthy working conditions adequately. Child labor persisted, especially in agricultural occupations, the report said.
The government sometimes took corrective action, including prosecutions, against officials who violated the law, and police officers sometimes acted with impunity, the report said, adding police corruption persisted.
You can read the full report here: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015
Height Insoles: Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site. I stumbledupon …
http://fishinglovers.net: Appreciate you sharing, great post.Thanks Again. Keep writi…
Achilles Pain causes: Every weekend i used to pay a quick visit this site, as i w…
April 22, 2016
Vietnam Says U.S. Reports on Its Human Rights Based on Incorrect Information
by Nhan Quyen • [Human Rights]
Spokesman Le Hai Binh at a regular press conference in Hanoi
by Vu Quoc Ngu, April 22, 2016
The annual report on human rights of Vietnam in 2015 of the U.S. Department of State refers to inaccurate information and presented a biased assessment on implementation of the Southeast Asian nation in human rights, said Spokesman Le Hai Binh of Vietnam’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Speaking at a regular press conference in Hanoi on April 21, Mr. Binh said the report released by the U.S. Department of State on April 13 recognized some results of Vietnam in ensuring human rights.
Vietnam always stands ready to engage in candid and open discussions with all countries including the US on the outstanding issues where we still have differences of opinion, Binh said.
Vietnam is ready to frankly discuss with other countries, including the U.S. on differences to enhance understanding and promote comprehensive cooperation, he noted.
According to the report of the U.S. Department of State, Vietnam is an authoritarian state monopolistically ruled by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV). The most recent National Assembly elections, held in 2011, were neither free nor fair, despite limited competition among CPV-vetted candidates. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces.
The Vietnamese government began implementing laws in accordance with constitutional amendments, including human rights-related articles, promulgated in January 2014. In November the National Assembly passed several laws affecting the rights of its citizens, including a new penal code, criminal procedure code, law on custody and temporary detention, civil code, and civil procedure code. The criminal procedure code and the custody law codified the presumption of innocence, placed the burden of proof in criminal proceedings on the state, recognized a limited right to remain silent in certain circumstances, and loosened regulations on the right to counsel. The penal code retained vague national security provisions and in some areas added new offenses criminalizing preparatory acts, the report said.
The most serious human rights problems in the country were severe government restrictions of citizens’ political rights, particularly their right to change their government through free and fair elections; limits on citizens’ civil liberties, including freedom of assembly, association, and expression; and inadequate protection of citizens’ due process rights, including protection against arbitrary detention, it said.
Other human rights abuses included arbitrary and unlawful deprivation of life; police attacks and corporal punishment; arbitrary arrest and detention for political activities; continued police mistreatment of suspects during arrest and detention, including the use of lethal force and austere prison conditions; and denial of the right to a fair and expeditious trial. The judicial system was opaque and lacked independence, and political and economic influences regularly affected judicial outcomes. The government limited freedom of speech and suppressed dissent; exercised control over and censorship of the press; restricted internet freedom and freedom of religion; maintained often-heavy surveillance of activists; and continued to limit privacy rights and freedoms of assembly, association, and movement. The government continued to control registration of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) closely, including human rights organizations. Authorities restricted visits by human rights NGOs that did not agree to government oversight. Authorities and NGOs recorded higher numbers of human trafficking victims, possibly attributable to growing demand among neighboring countries as well as the country’s decision in 2012 to improve its efforts to track and investigate cases. The government maintained limits on workers’ rights to form and join independent unions and did not enforce safe and healthy working conditions adequately. Child labor persisted, especially in agricultural occupations, the report said.
The government sometimes took corrective action, including prosecutions, against officials who violated the law, and police officers sometimes acted with impunity, the report said, adding police corruption persisted.
You can read the full report here: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015