When Chau Van Kham abruptly stopped responding to messages on a trip to Vietnam in January, his prolonged silence led to a seeping dread.
Key points:
Australian citizen Chau Van Kham was arrested in Ho Chi Minh City on January 15
He is being investigated for alleged activities against the Vietnamese Government
If convicted of the offence, he could face a lengthy jail term or even the death penalty
His family, based in Australia and the UK, feared he had been spirited away.
Mr Chau, 69, is an Australian citizen and retired small businessman from Sydney who fled Vietnam by boat in 1982. He once fought alongside US troops during the Vietnam War and is a long-time pro-democracy and human rights activist.
Now, heis under investigation for alleged activities against Vietnam’s communist Government — an offence that can carry the death penalty in the most serious cases.
He is also being denied access to a lawyer.
Dennis said the news his father had been detained, however distressing, was a slight relief as at least he hadn’t disappeared.
Mr Chau’s family suspected he was on some kind of Government watch list for his pro-democracy activities.
In fact, it was something they used to joke about, when the concept of arrest was inconceivable.
“I just didn’t imagine it would ever happen — I was shocked,” Dennis said.
In a statement, Vietnam’s Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesman Le Thi Thu Hang confirmed that “Chau Van Kham is currently detained and under investigation for violating Vietnamese laws”, but declined to specify which laws had been breached.
Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was providing consular assistance to an Australian man detained in Vietnam, but for privacy reasons was unable to provide further details.
But a DFAT report to the family following Mr Chau’s sole consular visit on January 28, seen by the ABC, reveals the Australian retiree is being investigated under Article 109 — which refers to alleged operations to overthrow the Government.
Nestled between “high treason” and “espionage” in Vietnam’s criminal code, Article 109 says that a person who joins an organisation that acts against the people’s Government can be punished with 12 to 20 years behind bars, life imprisonment or death.
Suspected accomplices face lesser penalties, ranging from 12 months to 12 years in prison.
Mr Chau is also being investigated for allegedly breaching Article 341, which pertains to fabricating documents. Vietnamese authorities allege he used a fake Vietnamese identity card to enter the country.
As Mr Chau’s alleged crimes fall under national security breaches, he will be denied legal representation until after the investigation is already complete in late May, purportedly “to protect the secrecy” of the process.
Mr Chau was videotaped during the consular visit, prompting concerns that he wouldn’t be able to speak freely with Australian officials.
The family is also concerned about his ongoing health issues, including high cholesterol and prostatitis.
Dennis said he and his family were grappling with the reality of having their father incarcerated under a judicial system that seems so far removed from Australia’s.
“It’s not a law system that you’re used to. You don’t know what to expect … [is he] going to be mistreated in jail?” Dennis said.
“If he does eventually come home, is he going to be the same? Or is he going to be frail or broken? I just don’t know.”
Fleeing war, facing prison
In a YouTube clip, Mr Chau shares his experience of surviving the 1968 Tet offensive as a 19-year-old student in Hue, where thousands of civilians were killed en masse by the Vietcong and North Vietnamese forces.
But the chairman Do Hoang Diem rejected any suggestion of terrorism, saying the group aims “to promote democracy and human rights in Vietnam through non-violent civic action”.
He said Vietnam had “unleashed a severe crack down on dissidents” in the past three years and Mr Chau was gathering on-the-ground information about its impact.
“When facing such a lawless regime, dissidents and activists on their black list have no choice but to resort to finding other ways to enter Vietnam,” he said.
In a statement, Viet Tan said the Vietnamese Government often used arbitrary detention and “fabricated accusations to defame” the group, adding that Mr Chau had been “attacked” in a state-owned media outlet and his address had been published as “a tactic to intimidate his family”.
“Chau Van Kham has undoubtedly faced emotional duress and even forced confession,” it said.
Amnesty International estimates there are more than 100 prisoners of conscience in jail in Vietnam today, many of whom are slapped with lengthy prison terms after “farcical trials”.
Vietnam has “a terrible record of targeting people who peacefully say what they think”, an Amnesty spokesperson told the ABC in a statement.
“A simple meeting or even a Facebook post could land you years in jail.”
Sentences are often pre-determined before trial for those cast as “enemies of the state” and “torture is often used by interrogators”.
Reflecting on his father’s activism, Dennis said he often asked why he continued to advocate for human rights and democracy in a country where he no longer lived.
His father told him it was because people don’t have basic freedoms in Vietnam.
“I think that motivates him to do it. He’s always been very, very passionate about it,” Dennis said.
February 10, 2019
Australian detained in Vietnam, Chau Van Kham, investigated for crime that carries death penalty
by Nhan Quyen • [Human Rights]
Photo:The Australian was in Vietnam on a “fact-finding mission” in the wake of a Government crack down. (Supplied: Viet Tan)Related Story:Family fears for pro-democracy activist detained in VietnamRelated Story:Trial puts Vietnamese activists in spotlightRelated Story:Australian protester freed after Vietnam arrest
ABC News, February 10, 2019
When Chau Van Kham abruptly stopped responding to messages on a trip to Vietnam in January, his prolonged silence led to a seeping dread.
Key points:
His family, based in Australia and the UK, feared he had been spirited away.
Mr Chau, 69, is an Australian citizen and retired small businessman from Sydney who fled Vietnam by boat in 1982. He once fought alongside US troops during the Vietnam War and is a long-time pro-democracy and human rights activist.
It is a devotionthat led him to cross from Cambodia into Vietnamese territory in what would prove to be an ill-fated “fact-finding” mission.
“I was most worried about him disappearing,” his son Dennis Chau, 29, told the ABC from the United Kingdom.
Mr Chau was arrested in Ho Chi Minh Cityon January 15 after meeting with a civil society activist.
Now, heis under investigation for alleged activities against Vietnam’s communist Government — an offence that can carry the death penalty in the most serious cases.
He is also being denied access to a lawyer.
Dennis said the news his father had been detained, however distressing, was a slight relief as at least he hadn’t disappeared.
Mr Chau’s family suspected he was on some kind of Government watch list for his pro-democracy activities.
In fact, it was something they used to joke about, when the concept of arrest was inconceivable.
“I just didn’t imagine it would ever happen — I was shocked,” Dennis said.
In a statement, Vietnam’s Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesman Le Thi Thu Hang confirmed that “Chau Van Kham is currently detained and under investigation for violating Vietnamese laws”, but declined to specify which laws had been breached.
Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was providing consular assistance to an Australian man detained in Vietnam, but for privacy reasons was unable to provide further details.
‘Operations to overthrow the Government’
Photo:Amnesty International estimates there are more than 100 prisoners of conscience in Vietnam’s jails today. (Reuters: Nguyen Huy Kham)
But a DFAT report to the family following Mr Chau’s sole consular visit on January 28, seen by the ABC, reveals the Australian retiree is being investigated under Article 109 — which refers to alleged operations to overthrow the Government.
Nestled between “high treason” and “espionage” in Vietnam’s criminal code, Article 109 says that a person who joins an organisation that acts against the people’s Government can be punished with 12 to 20 years behind bars, life imprisonment or death.
Suspected accomplices face lesser penalties, ranging from 12 months to 12 years in prison.
Mr Chau is also being investigated for allegedly breaching Article 341, which pertains to fabricating documents. Vietnamese authorities allege he used a fake Vietnamese identity card to enter the country.
As Mr Chau’s alleged crimes fall under national security breaches, he will be denied legal representation until after the investigation is already complete in late May, purportedly “to protect the secrecy” of the process.
Mr Chau was videotaped during the consular visit, prompting concerns that he wouldn’t be able to speak freely with Australian officials.
The family is also concerned about his ongoing health issues, including high cholesterol and prostatitis.
Photo:Chau Van Kham, pictured last year with his wife, Trang Chau, has lived in Australia since 1982. (Supplied: Chau Family)
Dennis said he and his family were grappling with the reality of having their father incarcerated under a judicial system that seems so far removed from Australia’s.
“It’s not a law system that you’re used to. You don’t know what to expect … [is he] going to be mistreated in jail?” Dennis said.
Fleeing war, facing prison
In a YouTube clip, Mr Chau shares his experience of surviving the 1968 Tet offensive as a 19-year-old student in Hue, where thousands of civilians were killed en masse by the Vietcong and North Vietnamese forces.
Photo:While it was often a struggle in their early years in Sydney, the family saw Australia as a land of opportunity. (Supplied: Chau Family)
But to his sons, Mr Chau is simply known as dad.
Arriving on Australian shores in 1982, Mr Chau became a citizen the following year. He met his wife, Trang, who came to Australia in 1983.
They married in 1986 and had two sons, Daniel, 31, and Dennis, 29.
The family lived above the Sydney laundry shop Mr Chau ran until he opened a bakery.
“When he came to Australia, he thought it was all about opportunities he wouldn’t get in Vietnam,” Dennis said.
But weekends were for spending time with his sons — taking them to the beach, playing tennis and going swimming.
In his retirement, Mr Chau became an active member of Viet Tan, a group branded a “terrorist force” and outlawed in Vietnam.
Photo:Mr Chau’s family describe him as someone who cares deeply about democracy and freedom. (Supplied: Chau Family)
But the chairman Do Hoang Diem rejected any suggestion of terrorism, saying the group aims “to promote democracy and human rights in Vietnam through non-violent civic action”.
He said Vietnam had “unleashed a severe crack down on dissidents” in the past three years and Mr Chau was gathering on-the-ground information about its impact.
“When facing such a lawless regime, dissidents and activists on their black list have no choice but to resort to finding other ways to enter Vietnam,” he said.
In a statement, Viet Tan said the Vietnamese Government often used arbitrary detention and “fabricated accusations to defame” the group, adding that Mr Chau had been “attacked” in a state-owned media outlet and his address had been published as “a tactic to intimidate his family”.
“Chau Van Kham has undoubtedly faced emotional duress and even forced confession,” it said.
Amnesty International estimates there are more than 100 prisoners of conscience in jail in Vietnam today, many of whom are slapped with lengthy prison terms after “farcical trials”.
Vietnam has “a terrible record of targeting people who peacefully say what they think”, an Amnesty spokesperson told the ABC in a statement.
Sentences are often pre-determined before trial for those cast as “enemies of the state” and “torture is often used by interrogators”.
Photo:Mr Chau’s family have been told DFAT is working on his case. (Supplied: Chau Van Kham, Facebook)
Reflecting on his father’s activism, Dennis said he often asked why he continued to advocate for human rights and democracy in a country where he no longer lived.
His father told him it was because people don’t have basic freedoms in Vietnam.
“I think that motivates him to do it. He’s always been very, very passionate about it,” Dennis said.
“He’s always put other people ahead of himself.”